Bowers & Wilkins P7

Reference Price: ? 399 USD
Overall Rating
1.8
Scientific Validity
0.3
Technology Level
0.3
Cost-Performance
0.2
Reliability & Support
0.4
Design Rationality
0.6

Discontinued headphones with problematic bass distortion and poor cost-performance despite premium materials and traditional design approach.

Overview

The Bowers & Wilkins P7 is a closed-back circumaural headphone featuring 40mm dynamic drivers, launched in 2013. Built with premium materials including aluminum, sheepskin leather, and stainless steel, the P7 was positioned as a high-end portable headphone. The headphones feature a folding design for portability and detachable cables. While the construction quality appears substantial, the P7 has been discontinued and is now only available in the used market, having been superseded by newer wireless models in B&W’s current lineup.

Scientific Validity

\[\Large \text{0.3}\]

The P7’s measured performance shows deficiencies against objective criteria. THD performance is acceptable at mid frequencies (<0.3% at 1kHz/10mW [1]) but reaches 8.5% at 20Hz/100dBA under extreme conditions (measured by Stereophile using 1mW signal calculated for rated 22-ohm impedance [2]), exceeding the 0.5% problematic threshold for headphones. Frequency response spans 10Hz-20kHz [1] but exhibits deviations from neutral with bass boost approximately 5dB over midrange [3]. Impedance measures 22.9 ohms (Reference Audio Analyzer) to 25 ohms nominal (Stereophile) [1][2] with sensitivity varying between 101.7 dB SPL (Stereophile, 1mW/22 ohms) and 116.8 dB SPL (Reference Audio Analyzer) across test conditions, indicating measurement variance but sufficient efficiency. The frequency response shows some adherence to target curves with gentle rise from 400Hz to 2.8kHz [3], but overall measured performance falls below contemporary standards.

Technology Level

\[\Large \text{0.3}\]

The P7 represents outdated 2013 headphone technology with no meaningful innovations. It employs conventional 40mm dynamic drivers using traditional materials and standard construction methods available to any manufacturer. The folding design offers basic portability but demonstrates no technical sophistication. The wireless variant’s Bluetooth with aptX was contemporary for 2013 but represents obsolete technology by current standards. The design lacks proprietary patent technology, cutting-edge innovations, or advanced technical integration. No other manufacturers would seek to adopt this mature, undifferentiated approach. The technology level falls below contemporary standards with no evidence of technical advancement that would justify premium positioning or provide competitive advantage duration beyond basic market entry barriers.

Cost-Performance

\[\Large \text{0.2}\]

With an original MSRP of 399 USD, the P7 faces severe cost-performance challenges. The Audio-Technica ATH-M40x at 99 USD provides equivalent-or-better functionality and measured performance. Both offer closed-back over-ear circumaural design with 40mm dynamic drivers and detachable cables. The ATH-M40x specifications include 35-ohm nominal impedance (measured 38.5Ω), 114.0 dB SPL sensitivity, and 15Hz-24kHz frequency response [4]. Measured performance shows the ATH-M40x maintains substantially lower THD across frequencies compared to the P7’s catastrophic 8.5% THD at 20Hz/100dBA bass distortion. While the ATH-M40x exhibits a notable frequency response dip between 200Hz-1kHz and left-right channel differences of 4dB in the 100Hz-400Hz region [4], it avoids the severe bass distortion that renders the P7 unsuitable for accurate reproduction. The ATH-M40x provides equivalent impedance characteristics suitable for portable use and, despite its frequency response limitations, delivers objectively superior measured performance where the P7 critically fails. Both products offer professional monitoring capabilities, but the ATH-M40x’s absence of severe bass distortion makes it functionally superior for audio reproduction. CP = 99 ÷ 399 = 0.25, rounded to 0.2.

Reliability & Support

\[\Large \text{0.4}\]

The P7 receives a standard 2-year warranty from Bowers & Wilkins [5]. Construction uses premium materials suggesting robust build quality, but user reports indicate potential issues with music distortion during movement over time, suggesting possible internal component degradation [6]. B&W provides manufacturer support through dealers and distributors with warranty processing available. As a discontinued product, parts availability and long-term support may be limited. The relatively simple analog construction with minimal electronic components should inherently resist failure, but reported reliability issues contradict the premium material quality.

Rationality of Design Philosophy

\[\Large \text{0.6}\]

Bowers & Wilkins demonstrates a measurement-focused approach with their stated philosophy of “True Sound” and “nothing added, nothing taken away,” aligning with scientific audio principles [7]. The company invests in measurement technology and research, showing commitment to objective audio quality improvement. However, the P7’s premium pricing relative to measured performance suggests costs not directly contributing to measurable improvements. The traditional analog approach without advanced DSP or digital integration represents conservative rather than innovative thinking. While the company’s general philosophy emphasizes transparency and faithful reproduction, the P7 specifically shows compromises in bass distortion that contradict these stated principles.

Advice

The P7 cannot be recommended due to measured performance issues and poor value proposition. While extreme bass distortion (8.5% THD at 20Hz/100dBA) is reported under extreme conditions, more significant is the overall measured performance falling below contemporary standards. Combined with extremely poor cost-performance where superior alternatives like the Audio-Technica ATH-M40x deliver better measured performance at 25% of the price, the P7 represents an economically irrational choice. The discontinuation and used-market-only availability further diminish its appeal. Potential buyers should avoid this outdated model and consider current headphone offerings that provide superior technical performance, better value proposition, and ongoing manufacturer support.

References

  1. Reference Audio Analyzer, Bowers & Wilkins P7 Measurement’s report, https://reference-audio-analyzer.pro/en/report/hp/bower-wilkins-p7.php, accessed 2025-09-27
  2. Stereophile, Bowers & Wilkins P7 Wireless Bluetooth Over-Ear Headphones Measurements, https://www.stereophile.com/content/bowers-wilkins-p7-wireless-bluetooth-over-ear-headphones-measurements, accessed 2025-09-27
  3. SoundStage Network, Bowers & Wilkins P7 Headphones, https://www.soundstagenetwork.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1219:bowers-wilkins-p7-headphones&catid=263&Itemid=203, accessed 2025-09-27
  4. Audio-Technica, ATH-M40x Professional Studio Monitor Headphones, https://www.audio-technica.com/en-us/ath-m40x, accessed 2025-09-27
  5. Bowers & Wilkins, Warranty Information, https://www.bowerswilkins.com/en-us/warranty.html, accessed 2025-09-27
  6. AVForums, Bowers & Wilkins P7 Headphones guarantee question, https://www.avforums.com/threads/bowers-wilkins-p7-headphones-guarantee-question.1938101/, accessed 2025-09-27
  7. Bowers & Wilkins, Performance Technology Leadership, https://www.bowerswilkins.com/en-us/our-story/performance-technology-leadership.html, accessed 2025-09-27

(2025.9.28)