Overview

The Sennheiser HD 599 represents a cornerstone of the company’s traditional open-back headphone lineup. Since its 2016 launch, it has gained popularity among users from beginners to intermediates with its warm sound signature and relatively manageable 50-ohm impedance. The product boasts craftsmanship from its German and Irish heritage, featuring detachable cables and E.A.R. technology for an expansive soundfield. However, from the perspective of measurement data and price competitiveness, its position in today’s market must be evaluated critically.

Scientific Validity

\[\Large \text{0.6}\]

While claiming a frequency response of 12Hz-38.5kHz, third-party measurement data reveals significant elevation in the low-midrange region. THD+N is specified as under 0.1% at 1kHz, 100dB SPL, which falls within acceptable ranges for headphones but doesn’t reach the transparent level of 0.05% or below. Sensitivity is rated at 106dB SPL, providing adequate drive capability. However, frequency response flatness within ±3dB is not achieved, with measurable coloration particularly evident in the low-midrange. Sound isolation performance cannot be expected due to the open-back design, though this is by design specification. Scientifically, the measurement results produce audible sound quality differences, but significant room for improvement exists from a transparency perspective.

Technology Level

\[\Large \text{0.5}\]

The conventional design employs 38mm dynamic drivers with no notable technological innovations. E.A.R. (Ergonomic Acoustic Refinement) technology is claimed as a proprietary acoustic tuning method, but based on measurement results, it appears to remain within industry-standard approaches. The 50-ohm impedance and 106dB SPL sensitivity design represents a practical choice considering portable device compatibility. The detachable cable design contributes to improved practicality. However, compared to other manufacturers’ products available at similar price points, no specifications or innovative design elements demonstrating technical superiority can be confirmed. This represents an industry-average technology level.

Cost-Performance

\[\Large \text{0.4}\]

Against the current Japanese market price of 193 USD (approximately 195 USD), the Philips SHP9500 exists as a competitive product with equivalent or superior measurement performance at 83 USD (approximately 84 USD). The calculation 84 USD ÷ 195 USD = 0.43, rounded to 0.4. The SHP9500 features 50-ohm impedance, an open-back design, and excellent frequency response flatness, showing equivalent or superior performance to the HD 599 in many measurement categories. Furthermore, among current products, the Sennheiser HD 560S (153 USD) offers newer technology and superior linear performance, while the HiFiMan HE400SE (121 USD) provides excellent measurement performance through planar magnetic technology. The HD 599’s characteristic warm sound signature represents measurable coloration, with no recognized superiority in objective performance aspects. Price competitiveness remains at a low level.

Reliability & Support

\[\Large \text{0.6}\]

Sennheiser provides a 2-year product warranty, which is an industry-standard level. The company is strengthening its quality control systems, including a major investment of over 10 million euros in its Romanian production facility in 2023. In major markets, a support system is established through authorized distributors. However, recent consumer reviews report quality control issues, particularly with new-generation wireless products, with mixed opinions regarding customer service response. The HD 599’s relatively simple wired design suggests a lower risk of complex failures, but overall enterprise-level reliability remains at industry-average standards.

Rationality of Design Philosophy

\[\Large \text{0.4}\]

The HD 599’s design philosophy is based on a traditional approach emphasizing “warm sound.” However, this manifests as frequency response coloration in measurements, making it irrational from the perspective of transparent and faithful source reproduction. The low-midrange emphasis reflects musical preference tuning but scientifically represents a factor that compromises source fidelity. The 50-ohm low impedance design is rational for portable device compatibility, but similar convenience is achieved by competitive products. While the open-back design itself is acoustically rational, no special technical advantages are recognized. It lacks the technical rationality and innovation commensurate with its price, remaining a conservative approach against market trends toward improved transparency.

Advice

For those considering purchasing the HD 599, I recommend first conducting an objective evaluation of its price-to-performance ratio. With the same budget, the Philips SHP9500 (84 USD) can deliver equivalent or superior measurement performance, making it the rational choice for a pure focus on sound quality. Even if you value the HD 599’s “warmth,” this is scientifically a frequency response coloration that can be achieved through EQ. As superior alternatives, the Sennheiser HD 560S (153 USD) from the same manufacturer offers excellent linear performance through newer technology, while the HiFiMan HE400SE (121 USD) provides highly transparent reproduction through planar magnetic technology. For those with an attachment to the Sennheiser brand, the HD 599 SE (94 USD) presents a more realistic choice price-wise. In any case, I strongly recommend confirmation in a listening environment and an objective comparative examination with alternative products.

(2025.8.2)