Overview

The Topping E4x4 Pre is a 4-in/4-out USB audio interface positioned for professional recording. It supports 24-bit/192 kHz, offers dual USB-C, four ultra-linear mic pre modules with 48 V, zero-latency hardware monitoring, and per-channel LED meters [1][2].

Scientific Validity

\[\Large \text{0.8}\]

Manufacturer data at 24-bit/96 kHz reports: mic input EIN −130.5 dBu, mic THD+N −110 dB (0.0003%), dynamic range 115 dB, SNR 115 dB, response 20 Hz–40 kHz (±0.2 dB). Line-in THD+N −107 dB; line-out THD+N −100 dB (0.001%) with SNR 115 dB; headphone THD+N −100 dB with up to 580 mW ×2 at 32 Ω (THD+N<1%) [1]. These exceed typical transparency thresholds around 105 dB DR. Because comprehensive third-party measurements for E4x4 Pre could not be confirmed, the score is reduced by 0.1.

Technology Level

\[\Large \text{0.5}\]

Judgment basis made explicit:

• Signal path: four self-developed “Ultra-linear” mic-pre modules with switchable INST, 48 V phantom, and per-channel gain; NFCA-LE headphone amp section [1].
• I/O & monitoring: 4× inputs on XLR/TRS combo, 4× balanced TRS line outs, hardware direct-monitor with knob and LED meters [1][2].
• Connectivity & power: dual USB-C (data plus auxiliary power) and driver/control software [2].

These are modern, class-standard building blocks for a 4×4 interface. There is no evidence of novel conversion, clocking, routing, or protection architecture that would constitute a class-leading technical leap; hence a mid score.

Cost-Performance

\[\Large \text{0.8}\]

Comparison target (same function class, equal or better transparency): MOTU M4 at 220 USD.
Concrete spec-level comparison showing “comparable or higher” performance:

• Mic pre EIN (lower is better)
  • E4x4 Pre: −130.5 dBu (A-wt, 150 Ω) [1]
  • MOTU M4: −129 dBu quoted [3]
  → E4x4 Pre is better by 1.5 dB on EIN; both are in the transparent tier.

• Line output dynamic range (higher is better)
  • E4x4 Pre: 115 dB (A-wt) [1]
  • MOTU M4: 120 dB measured/quoted on TRS outs [3]
  → M4 exceeds E4x4 Pre by 5 dB on output DR.

• Independent verification
  • E4x4 Pre: comprehensive third-party suite not found.
  • MOTU M4: independent measurement review confirming transparent-class performance (ASR) [4].
  → When price-weighting transparency, M4’s independently-verified output path and strong EIN support equivalence or advantage versus E4x4 Pre.

Price math used for CP score
M4 220 USD vs E4x4 Pre 266 USD. 220 ÷ 266 = 0.827 → 0.8.
Conclusion: at materially lower price, M4 matches or exceeds E4x4 Pre on at least one core transparency metric and has independent verification; thus E4x4 Pre’s cost-performance is capped at 0.8.

Reliability & Support

\[\Large \text{0.3}\]

Evidence-based judgment criteria:

• Documented incidents: Topping L30 recall for failures that could damage headphones (official statement) [5]; PA5 failures linked to a potted D01 module widely reported with community replacement efforts [6].
• Warranty/logistics: 1-year warranty and centralized service; shipping burdens may apply depending on region [2].

Although these are different product lines, repeated cross-product issues weigh on perceived long-term reliability and service confidence for professional use.

Rationality of Design Philosophy

\[\Large \text{0.3}\]

Assessment criteria and outcome:

• Goal clarity: prioritizes low noise/distortion and transparency — rational for pro capture [1].
• Risk controls & robustness: history of failures/recalls in other lines suggests potential trade-offs in QA, protection, and repairability at brand level [5][6].
• Lifecycle support: one-year warranty and centralized service are modest for professional uptime demands [2].

The emphasis on bench performance is logical, but the balance against robustness and service infrastructure appears suboptimal for mission-critical workflows.

Advice

If you need a transparent 4×4 USB interface, MOTU M4 (220 USD) should be your starting point: equal-or-better output DR, comparable EIN, independent test data, and strong value [3][4]. E4x4 Pre (266 USD) offers excellent quoted numbers and practical monitoring features [1][2], but the price premium, limited third-party verification, and brand-level reliability concerns mean you should scrutinize warranty and support routing before purchase.

References

[1] Topping E4x4 Pre User Manual (specs/measurements), https://topping.pro/downloads/e4x4pre.pdf
[2] Topping E4x4 Pre product page, https://topping.pro/e4x4pre/
[3] Sound On Sound, MOTU M4 & M2 review (quotes 120 dB DR, −129 dBu EIN), https://www.soundonsound.com/reviews/motu-m4-m2
[4] Audio Science Review, MOTU M4 review & measurements, https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/motu-m4-audio-interface-review.15757/
[5] Topping L30 recall statement, https://www.reddit.com/r/headphones/comments/kwkh6z/topping_issues_recall_of_l30_amps_with_serial/
[6] Audio Science Review, PA5 fix / D01 module replacement thread, https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/topping-pa5-fix-d01-module-replacement-for-everyone.44219/

(2025.10.6)